About Us:

Data Driven Detroit (D3) provides accessible, high-quality information and analysis to drive decision-making that strengthens communities in Southeast Michigan.

Plane, Train, or Automobile (or Bus)

By Louis Bach, Communications

Amtrak has announced that they are upgrading the infrastructure on their Detroit-Chicago line:

A $196 million grant will reduce train travel time by 30 minutes between Detroit and Chicago. U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood awarded the grant to the Michigan Department of Transportation for track and signal improvements between Detroit and Kalamazoo. The improvements will allow for speeds up to 110 mph on 77 percent of Amtrak’s Wolverine and Blue Water services between Detroit and Chicago, resulting in a 30 minute reduction in travel time between those destinations.

If someone were planning to travel between Motown and the Windy City for the holidays, how would faster trains alter their decision with regards to transport mode?

A quick calculation gives us a rough idea for a one-way trip.

•  A flight between Detroit and Chicago costs at least $70; the flight itself takes ninety minutes, but DTW recommends travelers show up two hours before their flight time, for a total travel time of three and a half hours.

•  A train ride on December 23 costs at least $32 and currently takes five hours forty-five minutes; after Amtrak’s upgrades it should take five hours fifteen minutes.

•  A trip on the Megabus for December 23 costs $39 and takes five hours forty minutes.

•  Driving has costs and benefits more complicated than other modes. (For example, car ownership represents a high fixed cost but each trip represents a low marginal cost, particularly with passengers.) We can simplify the calculus behind driving considering only the cost of gas: the average gas price multiplied by the average fuel economy of a car multiplied by the length of the trip in miles. The average price of gas at the end of November is $3.30. The average fuel economy of a car is 27.5 miles per gallon. The driving distance from Detroit to Chicago is about 300 miles. So the cost of driving from Detroit to Chicago is about $36 and takes about five hours.

So for our hypothetical holiday travel, a train ride is the cheapest, but other options are faster. A traveler decides which mode to use by weighing the time savings against the difference in price.

•  To make the car an equal or better value against current train service, you need to value your time at only $5.33/hour or more; after Amtrak’s upgrades, you would need to value your time at $16/hour or more. (In other words, if you are willing to pay at least $5.33 to save an hour of your time, driving is worth its price; however, after Amtrak’s upgrades, driving would be worthwhile only if you’re willing to pay at least $16 to save an hour.)

•  Air travel requires a traveler to value their time at $16.89/hour currently, and $21.71/hour post-upgrade.

•  The bus faces the steepest competition from the train: currently it’s slightly more expensive for the same travel time, and the train will be both faster and cheaper after the infrastructure upgrade.

 

5 comments to Plane, Train, or Automobile (or Bus)

  • Rob R

    That’s great that this is officially happening! Good analysis, though I typically like to use the government rate (something like 50 cents per mile) when calculating the true cost of driving.

    I make that trip quite a bit and have experimented with all three modes of transit you describe. I’ve noticed that off peak, Megabus is more typically the cheapest option (I usually pay $18 when booking 7-10 days in advance), is quite a bit faster than Amtrak, and stops directly downtown. Amtrak has some real disadvantages- it’s typically significantly late due to freight right-of-way, and the station drop-off in New Center is not convenient. If budget’s a concern, airplane (which I’ve seen as low as $39 each way) doesn’t really make sense because you’ll likely have to rent a car just to get to Detroit.

    BUT, of the three modes, Amtrak is by far the most comfortable, and there’s enough space for me to work on a laptop as productively (possibly more so, due to limited distractions) as if I’m in the office. It’d be good to see the speed gains.

  • Pat D

    A key assumption is that there are no unanticipated delays with the modes of transportation mentioned. Of course, each transportation mode has its unique opportunities and occurrences for delays. It would be interesting to evaluate the on-time performance of the different transportation modes and incorporate a delay calculation (for example, percent probability of delay multiplied by average delay time) into the equation.

  • Oh my goodness! Impressive article dude! Many thanks,
    However I amm having difficulties with your RSS.
    I don’t understand why I can’t subscribe tto it. Is there anybody else having similar RSS issues?
    Anyone that knows the answer can you kindly respond?
    Thanx!!

  • This was an interesting piece, I’m happy I chanced upon it and I’ll certainly be checking back to catch up what others have to say regards the matter. Again, thank you, appreciated it.

  • setuju bos, ane sepakat ama Postingan ente bos

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>