Energy Usage Map: New York City

Check out the energy use map developed by Columbia University’s School of Engineering and Applied Science for New York City. The map’s been widely covered for providing an important service to accelerate the conversation around energy use and related concepts: conservation, cogeneration, etc.

We like the map too. In the spirit of critical examination, we couldn’t help but begin to explore its strengths and weaknesses. We have two concerns:

  1. As many of the map’s commenters have pointed out, the map is normalized by lot size, not by buildings’ floor space or usage. That means that small lots with heavily-used energy-intensive buildings (e.g., lower Manhattan’s skyscrapers) are shown in red for their high energy use, while lower-density lots (in, e.g., the outer boroughs) tend to be shown in green, indicating lower energy use. This is probably an artifact of limited data; it’s non-trivial, for example, to get access to the data you’d need to estimate the floor-space of every building in New York City. (It’s even harder to estimate how intensively buildings are used when you’re considering how to compare residential buildings to commercial buildings.) Nevertheless, it’s very hard to honestly compare how efficiently large, dense buildings use their energy compared to smaller buildings based on lot size alone.
  2. The map’s methodology, although sound, carries more limitations than the casual observer might realize. The researchers had energy usage data that had been aggregated to the ZIP code level, not data for individual buildings. They used statistical regression to estimate how much energy any given building is likely to consume. At a glance, though, you could be forgiven for mistakenly thinking that these data reflect actual measurements, not merely estimates. Ultimately, however, there’s no way of knowing from this map whether any given building is more or less energy efficient than another based on this map alone.

The map’s makers clarified their purpose in the comments section the New York Times’ coverage of the map:

First we would like to clarify that the energy consumption visualized on the map does not embody energy efficiency. The annual building energy consumption values portray what a particular building is estimated to consume, on average, given its size and building type. The actual building may consume more or less depending on a variety of factors.

Perhaps a building is LEED-certified, containing many energy efficiency measures. If one were to look at the energy bills of the building and compare them to the estimated values on the map, the energy consumption may be significantly less. On the other hand, maybe a particular building uses old inefficient systems to provide space heating and hot water. If one were to compare the energy bills of that building with the estimates on the map, the energy consumption may be significantly higher.

The main goal of the building energy map is to get the conversation started as to how much energy is being consumed and where.

We agree with the comments that perhaps normalizing by the square footage of the building would have provided a more interesting perspective. The map, however, would not look much different. In addition to the buildings in midtown being extremely large, they are also used for energy-intensive purposes. Offices and Stores are among the highest consumers of energy, according to our estimates.

What would stand out in a map of energy per building area however are hospitals and educational facilities. Also we’d like to point out that only total energy consumption is visualized on the map. The patterns of consumption change when one looks at one particular end use.

6 responses to “Energy Usage Map: New York City”

  1. It can also be done manually on a chiropractic table. It is meant to be flexible and to supply a
    protective region for the major organs like the heart
    and the liver. It is not necessary to say that a lot of thinking makes people ‘heavy-headed’ bending the spine
    into a question mark.

  2. says:

    Howdy, I came across your blog site by means of Search engines while searching for a connected theme, your website came up, it looks good. I’ve truly added onto favourites|added to my book marks.

  3. For instance, pear shaped bean bags are bigger and provide more back support.
    This recipe works well with cherry pie filling or
    Blue Berry Pie filling. It used to be that I used a plain pancake mix of
    some sort with white bleached flour and shortening and the essentials of baking soda and baking powder.

  4. This disease is now a days growing with limitless speed which effects almost all human being.

    The anti snoring mouthpieces that come with
    the Ultimate Stop Snoring Solution allow you to move your lower jaw forward in small increments so that you do not advance the jaw
    too far forward too quickly. The central pillow region is comparably thinner than you
    are on the edges from the pillow to assure total alignment
    of the neck down towards your spine.

  5. You actually make it seem so easy along with your presentation however I in finding this matter to be really one thing that I believe I would by no means understand.
    It seems too complex and extremely broad for me.
    I’m taking a look forward in your subsequent put up, I’ll attempt to
    get the dangle of it!

  6. What’s up friends, how is all, and what you would like to say regarding this article, in my view its truly amazing in favor of me.

Leave a Reply